UTOPIA

Welcome to utopia

Membership is FREE and easy but we also welcome guests to freely post in the forum without registration.

Please tell others and spread the word utopia is now open!

ALTERNATIVE NEWS, MYSTERY'S, UFO'S,PARANORMAL


    Government Confirm Chemtrails and We Have Picture Evidence of Chemtrail Plane

    Share
    avatar
    Admin
    Admin

    Posts : 50
    Join date : 2012-12-16
    Location : The Other Side

    Government Confirm Chemtrails and We Have Picture Evidence of Chemtrail Plane

    Post  Admin on Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:32 am



    Is the picture below the first actual evidence of the highly controversial Chemtrail Planes? The number clearly shown here corresponds to this >> A method and apparatus for aerial fire suppression utilizing a potable fire retardant chemical dispensing system, readily adaptable, without extensive aircraft modification, to various makes of aircraft, for dispensing current types of forest and range fire fighting chemicals. The aerial delivery system is self contained and reusable. It enables cargo/utility aircraft to carry and dump a load, under control. The aerial delivery system is capable of attachment at the wing box, pressurized delivery from the nozzles, and nozzles directed straight downward.

    Inventors: John C. Hale, Christopher B. Harris, Daniel A. Kottman
    Original Assignee: Evergreen International Aviation, Inc.
    Primary Examiner: Michael J. Carone
    Secondary Examiner: Benjamin P Lee
    Attorneys: Brian L. Johnson, George C. Rondeau, Jr., Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
    Current U.S. Classification: 244/136; 137/899.2; 239/171; 244/118.1

    View patent at USPTO
    Search USPTO Assignment Database
    Download USPTO Public PAIR data
    Citations
    Cited Patent Filing date Issue date Original Assignee Title
    US1911431 14 May 1931 30 May 1933 IKEIGATION APPARATUS
    US2242705 6 Feb 1939 20 May 1941 WATER SPRAYING AIRPLANE
    US2493017 5 Aug 1946 3 Jan 1950 GRID SPRAY NOZZLE
    US2926688 8 May 1956 1 Mar 1960 PRECISE CONTROL DISTRIBUTION OF AIRPLANE FUEL STORES
    US3547000 1 Dec 1970 SYSTEM FOR DROPPING STORED MATERIAL FROM
    US3995328 13 Dec 1974 7 Dec 1976 The Boeing Company Vacuum toilet system
    US4172499 5 Dec 1977 30 Oct 1979 Canadair Limited Powder and water mixing and dropping system onboard an aircraft
    US4202061 29 Dec 1978 13 May 1980 The Boeing Company Lavatory wastewater disposal system for aircraft
    US4208949 3 May 1978 24 Jun 1980 Boeing Commercial Airplane Company Missile carrier airplane
    US5261440 26 Jan 1993 16 Nov 1993 Deutsche Aerospace Airbus GmbH Water supply system for an aircraft
    US5655732 9 Mar 1995 12 Aug 1997 Daimler-Benz Aerospace Airbus GmbH Apparatus for draining waste water from aircraft
    US5769124 12 Mar 1997 23 Jun 1998 Daimler-Benz Aerospace Airbus GmbH Fresh water supply system for an aircraft
    US6622966 23 Sep 2002 23 Sep 2003 System for extinguishing wild fires and method therefor
    US20040016848 25 Jul 2002 The Boeing Company STORE EJECTION SYSTEM WITH REPLACEABLE PRESSURE VESSEL
    Referenced by
    Citing Patent Filing date Issue date Original Assignee Title
    US7753314 5 Oct 2007 13 Jul 2010 L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. Systems and methods for aerial dispersion of materials
    US7819362 1 Mar 2007 26 Oct 2010 Evergreen International Aviation, Inc. Enhanced aerial delivery system
    US8066223 15 Jul 2010 29 Nov 2011 Evergreen International Aviation, Inc. Enhanced aerial delivery system
    US8079551 24 Aug 2010 20 Dec 2011 Evergreen International Aviation, Inc. Enhanced aerial delivery system
    Claims
    1. A system for an aircraft having wings with flaps having trailing edges, the flaps having an extended position for relatively slow flight of the aircraft, the aircraft having a fuselage with a longitudinal dimension, the aircraft having a nose and a tail, the nose being forward along the longitudinal dimension of the tail and the tail being aft along the longitudinal dimension of the nose, the aircraft having a longitudinal center of gravity located with respect the longitudinal dimension of the fuselage, the fuselage having a forward most center of gravity point CGf at a particular location along the longitudinal dimension of the fuselage and having an aft most center of gravity point CGa at another particular location along the longitudinal dimension of the fuselage aft of the forward most center of gravity point, the aircraft having performance requirements that dictate that the longitudinal center of gravity remain at or aft of the forward most center of gravity limit point, CGf, and that the longitudinal center of gravity remain at or forward of the aft most center of gravity limit point CGa, the aircraft having a wheel system for ground support of the aircraft, the fuselage having a bottom side configured to be the side of the fuselage nearest to a runway when the aircraft is being supported on the runway by the wheel system, the aircraft having a plurality of seat tracks configured to be removably coupled to passenger seats to secure the passenger seats to the aircraft when the passenger seats are coupled to the seat tracks, the system comprising:

    a plurality of material tanks configured to each contain material, the plurality of material tanks located inside the fuselage of the aircraft, at least one of the plurality of material tanks located aft along the longitudinal dimension of the fuselage of another one of the plurality of material tanks;
    at least one pressurized tank configured to contain a gas under pressure of at least 50 pounds per square inch (p.s.i.), the at least one pressurized tank coupled to the plurality of material tanks such that the gas when released from the pressurized tank assists in releasing material from containment within each of the plurality of material tanks; and
    a plurality of outlets coupled to the material tanks, the outlets extending from inside the fuselage and through the bottom side of the aircraft in a direction approximately perpendicular to the longitudinal dimension of the fuselage, the outlets configured to conduct material released from containment within the plurality of material tanks to be projected outside the fuselage of the aircraft in a direction approximately perpendicular to the longitudinal dimension of the fuselage, the outlets coupled to portions of at least some of the plurality of seat tracks of the aircraft to secure the outlets to the aircraft and sufficiently distributing thrust loads to the aircraft resulting from projection of the material through the outlets outside of the fuselage of the aircraft, the outlets approximately located along the longitudinal dimension of the fuselage immediately aft of the longitudinal location of the trailing edge of at least a pair of the flaps when the at least a pair of the flaps are in their extended position, the at least one pressurized tank and the material tanks so sized and positioned within the fuselage such that the longitudinal center of gravity is located at or between the forward most center of gravity limit point, CGf and the aft most center of gravity limit point CGa along the longitudinal dimension of the fuselage as the at least one pressurized tank releases the gas into the material tanks and as the material tanks empty in the predetermined order.
    2. The system of claim 1 wherein the material tanks are configured to contain material selected from the group consisting of at least a water, gel, decontamination compound, weather modification compound, oil spill treatment compound, and a firefighting compound.

    3. A system for an aircraft having wings, the aircraft having a fuselage with a longitudinal dimension, the aircraft having a nose and a tail, the nose being forward along the longitudinal dimension of the tail and the tail being aft along the longitudinal dimension of the nose, the aircraft having a wheel system for ground support of the aircraft, the fuselage having a bottom side configured to be the side of the fuselage nearest to a runway when the aircraft is being supported on the runway by the wheel system, the aircraft having a plurality of seat tracks configured to be removably coupled to passenger seats to secure the passenger seats to the aircraft when the passenger seats are coupled to the seat tracks, the system comprising:

    a material tank configured to contain material and located inside the fuselage of the aircraft;
    a pressurized tank configured to contain a pressurized gas, the pressurized tank so coupled to the material tank that the pressurized gas, when released from the pressurized tank, assists in releasing material from containment by the material tank; and
    a plurality of outlets extending from inside the fuselage through the bottom side of the aircraft and so coupled to the material tank to receive material from containment by the material tank and to project the released material outside of the fuselage of the aircraft, the outlets coupled to portions of at least some of the plurality of seat tracks of the aircraft to secure the outlets to the aircraft and sufficiently distributing thrust loads to the aircraft resulting from projection of the material through the outlets outside of the fuselage of the aircraft.
    4. A system comprising:

    an aircraft having wings, the aircraft having a fuselage with a longitudinal dimension, the aircraft having a nose and a tail, the nose being forward along the longitudinal dimension of the tail and the tail being aft along the longitudinal dimension of the nose, the aircraft having a wheel system for ground support of the aircraft, the fuselage having a bottom side configured to be the side of the fuselage nearest to a runway when the aircraft is being supported on the runway by the wheel system, the aircraft having a plurality of seat tracks configured to be removably coupled to passenger seats to secure the passenger seats to the aircraft when the passenger seats are coupled to the seat tracks;
    a material tank configured to contain material and located inside the fuselage of the aircraft;
    a pressurized tank configured to contain a pressurized gas, the pressurized tank so coupled to the material tank that the pressurized gas, when released from the pressurized tank, assists in releasing material from containment by the material tank; and
    a plurality of outlets extending from inside the fuselage through the bottom side of the aircraft and so coupled to the material tank to receive material from containment by the material tank and to project the released material outside of the fuselage of the aircraft, the outlets coupled to portions of at least some of the plurality of seat tracks of the aircraft to secure the outlets to the aircraft and sufficiently distributing thrust loads to the aircraft resulting from projection of the material through the outlets outside of the fuselage of the aircraft.
    5. A system for an aircraft having wings, the aircraft having a fuselage with a longitudinal dimension, the aircraft having a nose and a tail, the nose being forward along the longitudinal dimension of the tail and the tail being aft along the longitudinal dimension of the nose, the aircraft having a wheel system for ground support of the aircraft, the fuselage having a bottom side configured to be the side of the fuselage nearest to a runway when the aircraft is being supported on the runway by the wheel system, the aircraft having a plurality of seat tracks configured to be removably coupled to passenger seats to secure the passenger seats to the aircraft when the passenger seats are coupled to the seat tracks, the system comprising:

    a material tank configured to contain material and located inside the fuselage of the aircraft; and
    a plurality of outlets extending from inside the fuselage through the bottom side of the aircraft and so coupled to the material tank to receive material from containment by the material tank and to project the released material outside of the fuselage of the aircraft, the outlets coupled to portions of at least some of the plurality of seat tracks of the aircraft to secure the outlets to the aircraft and distribute thrust loads to the aircraft resulting from projection of the material through the outlets outside of the fuselage of the aircraft.
    avatar
    Admin
    Admin

    Posts : 50
    Join date : 2012-12-16
    Location : The Other Side

    Evergreen Aviation Admits to Chemtrail Contracts with USAF

    Post  Admin on Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:41 am

    Evergreen Aviation, one of the worlds largest private aviation companies admits to weather modification service. On their own website in the Markets section for their New Super Tanker they state Weather modification among other interesting service markets.
    Content copied directly from Evergreen Aviation website:
    MARKETS:
    • Firefighting
    • Oil Spill Containment
    • Weather Modification
    • Biochemical Decontamination
    “The Evergreen Supertanker is not just limited to fighting fire . It will be a true utilitarian aircraft with the capability to configure to different applications on short notice. This multimission aircraft can support sensitive security and environmental missions. The aircraft’s exceptional drop capabilities, loiter time and size make it an ideal tool to perform challenging homeland security missions, able to neutralize chemical attacks on military installments or major population centers, and help control large, environmentally disastrous oil spills.
    In addition, the upper deck of the Boeing 747 provides over 200 square feet of space that could be assigned as a command and control center. EIA possesses an FAA exemption number 1870C that permits the carriage of up to five individuals that are not crewmembers in the upper deck. This area is capable of providing space for command and control components that would assist in sophisticated mapping, incident monitoring and video/communications downlink relay that might require additional personnel over and above the required crew.”
    What airports will Evergreen operate the Supertanker out of?
    Evergreen will operate the aircraft from any major airport with sufficient ramp space to load the aircraft. These include civilian bases, joint use civilian/military bases and accessible military bases. Generally, the runway requirements for the Evergreen Supertanker are 8000 feet.
    Can the Supertanker fight fires at night, while they are most vulnerable?
    The Supertanker utilizes advanced avionics and flies at higher, safer altitudes, which will enable fire agencies the option of fighting fires at night, while they are dormant.
    Are there any other markets for the Evergreen Supertanker? Can it operate globally?
    Evergreen is studying other applications for the Supertanker. Oil spill containment, chemical decontamination and weather modification are all potential markets for this aircraft. Because the aircraft is pressurized, the Evergreen Supertanker has the capability of any long-range Boeing 747 passenger aircraft. This allows the aircraft to deploy to any international location.
    If you want to read up for yourself on this, just go to gibiru.com, do a search on “Weather Control”, and then start clicking through the links that come up. You might find it as surprising as I did. Here is the bottom line:
    Is weather control real?
    Yes.
    Do we have the technology to create a hurricane, or tornado, or earthquakes?
    Yes.
    Who has this technology?
    The US and Russia. But Russia has been offering the technology for sale.
    What specific technologies/techniques can be used to alter the weather and create storms?
    Several.
    High-energy lasers can be directed into the atmosphere which creates free oxygen (O2), this combined with hydrogen to create H2O – water. Space based lasers are even more effective, and can also create O3 (Ozone) in the process of creating water in the atmosphere. Water is the most essential element in weather. The amount of it at a given point in time at a given location can create wind shifts, rain, (obviously), snow, but a clever use of it can create a tornado, or, over water, a hurricane. Over warm ocean water, it creates a very powerful hurricane, and if created in the right position at the right time, prevailing winds will carry it where you want it to go.
    But far more effective than that technology is the HAARP project in Alaska. This uses VLF (Very low frequency) energy pulses bounced off the ionosphere to create extreme weather conditions anywhere in the world they wish to direct it. The Earth has a fundamental resonant frequency of 7.83 hz. Anything that operates at that frequency risks disturbing all aspects of the earth. Weather, earthquakes, etc. It depends upon the amount of power produced. HAARP produces 1.7 gigawatts.
    Here are a couple of interesting quotes about it I found on one of the websites I visited:
    ~~~
    “The $30 million [Pentagon] project, euphemistically named HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), is made to beam more than 1.7 gigawatts (billion watts) of radiated power into the ionosphere — the electrically charged layer above Earth’s atmosphere. Put simply, the apparatus is a reversal of a radio telescope — just transmitting instead of receiving. It will ‘boil the upper atmosphere’. After [heating] and disturbing the ionosphere, the radiations will bounce back onto the earth in for form of long waves which penetrate our bodies, the ground and the oceans.” ["Angels Don't Play This HAARP", page 8]
    Let us allow Dr. Begich explain this concept. “… this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth’s atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art ….” [Page 28]
    “… the goal is to learn how to manipulate the ionosphere on a more grand scale than the the Soviet Union could do with its similar facilities. HAARP would be the largest ionospheric heater in the world, located in a latitude most conducive to putting Eastlund’s invention into practice.” [Page 29] Furthermore, from this northern latitude, the energy could be aimed into the ionosphere so that it would bounce back down to the earth so it would come down wherever the scientists wanted it to come down. The secret was to learn how and where to aim it to hit the earth where they wanted it to hit, creating the type of disaster or weather they desired.
    In NEWS1198, “U.N. Treaty Proves Weather Control Is Real”, we report news articles that Malaysia actually contracted with a Russian Weather Modification company to create a hurricane that would be directed close enough to clear the smoke and smog from Malaysia’s cities without actually coming on to land to create devastation. This Russian company delivered, and Malaysia had clear skies.
    Our information also tells us that, not only can hurricanes be created, they can be dismantled should scientists so desire. And, they certainly can be driven on the ocean much like we drive our cars on roadways. Therefore, one has to ask why American scientists have allowed unprecedented hurricanes, like Andrew, to ever come on shore. Why are American scientists allowing extensive damage and lives lost to recent unprecedented storms, since they have the capability to keep these storms away from us?
    HAARP can create nuclear-sized explosions without radiation! [Page 38, 62]. This process is protected by patent 4,873,928.
    The greatest concern of New Age scientist Nick Begich, in his book, “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP”, is that scientists and the military are so very arrogant in their ignorant, reckless use of focused energy into the ionosphere. Military scientists talk about “kicking this thing in high gear to see what would happen”! This attitude is complete arrogance. What if they set off an unintended reaction in the atmosphere that cannot be controlled or stopped?”
    ~~~
    Well, if a country can deliver nuclear-like explosions anywhere in the world they wish, without using ICBM missiles and other nuclear delivery systems, then I suppose that makes traditional nuclear weapons arsenals obsolete for warfare purposes, and mostly only good for political posturing and negotiations. That would explain why both Russia and the US were willing to agree to disarmaments, and reductions in their nuclear proliferation. I think maybe that was the first time in human history that countries voluntarily chose to disarm themselves and reduce their ability to conduct war. Given the nature of mankind and his history, it would make much more sense if they had a better card up their sleeves.
    Judging by the apparent irresponsible arrogance of the people in charge of it as suggested by Begich, I wonder who should be in charge of decision-making for this technology. Once a technology is invented, it cannot be ‘un-invented’. It is now there, and some people will try to use it. Most will try to use it to their personal advantage and to support their agendas. Always, it seems that those that want to act in the interest of all mankind lack the same level of energy and determination of those acting in self interest, and so the people that push their way to the top into positions of power and authority rarely act responsibly or altruistically, but rather they act to gain power and wealth to themselves.
    Having said that, if we follow the line of reasoning logically, if we accept that current technology allows us to create a hurricane, then we have to ask ourselves who might have started a hurricane like Katrina that specifically destroyed the area where most of our oil refineries are? In whose interest does this serve? Who benefits from this?
    Another interesting question: Since we apparently not only have the ability to create a hurricane, and steer it, and even stop it – why did we choose not to stop Katrina from doing the damage it did? Is the information incorrect? Can we start them, but not stop them? Or is there some other reason that Katrina served the purposes of some people? I honestly don’t know. I’m wondering myself.
    Here is a chronology of the technological advances that contributed to weather control. The comments are not mine but come from that website that I found. I have to admit – as much as I would like to go back to thinking that the weather is not controllable, It’s hard to ignore this much information on the subject.
    TIMELINE
    1900: “Tesla applies for patent on a device to ‘Transmit Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediums.” In 1905, the U.S. Patent Office issue Patent #787,412 for this purpose. I bet it is news to everyone that the technology to transmit electrical power without wires exists, and exists so that the generation and transmission of electricity can be both bountiful and FREE! Of course, a lot of dollars of sales and profit would immediately vanish, so Tesla’s discovery was never made public.
    1924: “Confirmation that radio waves bounce off ‘ionosphere 1′ (an electrically charged layer starting at an altitude of 50 kilometers).”
    1938: “Scientist proposes to light up night sky by electron gyrotron heating from a powerful transmitter.” The fact that untold numbers of powerful electron heaters are pouring tens of millions of watts of electricity at Extremely Low Frequencies to effect this Weather Warfare is the major reason we are experiencing Global Warming! This warming has nothing to do with any Industrial pollutants or emssions, and certainly not from cow flatulance, as New Age extremists have claimed. New World Order planners are able to make dire predictions and then technologically deliver them!
    1940: “Tesla announces ‘death ray’ invention.” Our military evidently has the capability to create a defense shield over our continent by aiming these electron heaters correctly.
    1945: “Atomic bomb tests begin — 40,000 electromagnetic pulses to follow.”
    1952: “W.O. Schumman identifies 7.83 Hertz the resonant frequency of the Earth”.
    1958: “Van Allen radiation belts discovered (zones of charged particles trapped in earth’s magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up. Violently disrupted in the same year.”
    1958: “Project Argus, U.S. Navy explodes three nuclear bombs inside Van Allen belt.”
    1958: “White House advisor on weather modification says Defense Department studying ways to manipulate charges of ‘earth and sky, and so affect the weather’.” Wow! Did you know that such a department as “Weather Modification” existed in the White House way back in 1952? The mere existence of such an office strongly implies the technology to modify and control the weather existed.
    1960: “Series of weather disasters begin.”
    1961: “Scientists propose artificial ion cloud experiments. In 1960′s the dumping of chemicals (barium powder, etc.) from satellites and rockets began.”
    1961-62: “U.S.S.R. and U.S.A. create many electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) in the atmosphere. 300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer by about 4%.” Hmm, ozone layer depletion was intentionally created by both Russian and American governments by nuclear detonations? They not only knew about it, they measured the extent of the depletion and the time it lasted. Therefore, do you think it just might be possible that, once again, we have the situation where a dire prediction is made, with the knowledge that their scientists can actually make it happen?!
    1962: “Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating plasma resonances by antennas within the space plasma.”
    1966: “Gordon J.F. MacDonald publishes military ideas on environmental engineering.”
    1960′s: In Wisconsin, U.S. Navy Project Sanguine lays extremely low frequency (ELF) antennae.” We are told that the Navy needed this ELF capability to communicate with their submarines in a way that would be secure from enemy attack, a claim with which we do not argue. However, is it also possible that this ELF antennae may serve a dual purpose, of also helping to control the weather?
    1968: “Moscow scientists tell the West that they have pinpointed which pulsed magnetic field frequencies help mental and physiological functions and which frequencies do harm.” The very idea that a wicked totalitarian government serving Antichrist could know how to manipulate thought processes by the use of electromagmetic pusles is one of the most frightening thoughts imaginable! This little incident also shows the unusual cooperation between Russia and America at the height of the Cold War! Such cooperation constitutes proof of our claim that Russia has cooperated with the Western Powers since the beginning, in 1917, to stage the mock battle of Thesis battling Antithesis to produce the Synthesis system of Antichrist called the New World Order.
    1972: “First reports on ‘ionospheric heater’ experiments with high frequency radio waves at Arecibo [Alaska]. A 100 megawatt heater in Norway built later in the decade can change the conductivity of the auroral ionosphere.” Now, you are getting close to being able to control the weather. When you can manipulate the conductivity of the auroal ionosphere, where weather systems operate and originate, you are close to controlling the weather. Note the date here, at which time this technology was realized: 1972.
    1973: “Documentation that the launch of Skylab ‘halved the total electron content of the ionosphere for three hours’ (by rocket exhaust gases).”
    1974: “United Nations General Assembly bans environmental warfare.” We reported on this terrible treaty in NEWS1196, “U.N. Treaty Proves Weather Control Is Real”. You do not need a treaty banning Weather Warfare unless such technology already exists and has been proven effective. This means that this Weather Warfare technology has been fine tuned for 24 years.
    1974: “High frequency experiments at Plattsville, Colorado Arecibo, Puerto Rico, and in Armidale, New South Wales. These experiments heated the ‘bottom side of the ionosphere.”
    1974: “Experiments — airglow brightened by hitting oxygen atoms in ionosphere with accelerated electrons.”
    1975: “Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that very low frequency (VLF) from power lines is altering the ionosphere.” I remember this report well, as I scoffed at the idea that power lines could have that kind of effect on this huge earth. I never thought of the fact that the reason they could have this kind of effect is that they are just the right kind of frequency to affect the earth.
    1975: “U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces the Navy to release research showing that extremely low frequency (ELF) transmissions can altar human blood chemistry.” Once again, this technology begins to hit very close to home, does it not? When an enemy can altar my blood chemistry by aiming ELF transmissions at me, I can be destroyed with no knowledge of what is happening to me, or who is doing such lethal damage. Can you also sense the possibilty of control of an entire population, without the people ever being aware they are being manipulated?!
    1975: “U.S. Senator Pell, Senate Subcommitted, urges that weather and climate modification work should be overseen by a civilian agency answerable to the U.S. Congress. Didn’t happen.” In NEWS1196, we report that Senator Pell urged the United States to sign this United Nations treaty banning Weather Warfare. It sounds like Pell was very concerned about the use and misuse of this technology, even though he is fully aware of the New World Order Plan and has acted to support it for many years.
    1975: “Soviets begin pulsing ‘Woodpecker’ extremely low frequency (ELF) waves at key brainwave rhythms. Eugene, Oregon, was one of the locations where Woodpecker was aimed, and where people were particularly affected.” Once, again, I am extremely agitated to discover that an enemy can destroy me either biologically or mentally from a distance, without me being aware of it.
    1976: “Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey show that nerve cells are affected by ELF fields.”
    1979: “Launch of NASA’s third High-Energy Astrophysical Observatory causes large scale, artificially induced depletion in the ionosphere. The plasma hole was caused by ‘rapid chemical processes’ between rocket exhaust and the ozone layer. The ionosphere was significantly depleted over a horizontal distance of 300 km for some hours.”
    1985: “Bernard J. Eastlund applies for patent ‘Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere’. (First of three Eastlund patents assigned to ARCO Power Technologies, Inc.)”
    1986: “U.S. Navy Project Henhouse duplicates the Delgado (Madrid) experiment — very low level, very low frequency pulsed magnetic fields harm chick embryos.”
    1980′s: “In the latter part of the decade, the U.S. begins the network of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each to generate Very Low Frequency (VLF) waves …” IN NEWS1196, we reported that the GWEN towers created a high level electromagnetic dam in the atmosphere in the American Midwest that created the rain for 40 days and nights in 1993. GWEN towers were located right where the rain came down in such a Biblical type deluge. Furthermore, we showed a map of the United States where you could see the GWEN towers and where they were located. We found it extremely interesting that these towers were also located along the San Andreas fault in Califormai and Nevada, where all these earthquakes of the past decade have been occurring!
    1987-1992: “Other ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI) scientists build on Eastlund patents for development of new weapon capabilities.”
    1994: “Military contractor E-systems buys APTI, holder of Eastlund patents and contract to build the biggest ionospheric heater in the world, the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP). Even though construction of HAARP towers in Alaska began before this date, this was the time the decision was made to make it as large as it is now today, over 40 acres of ELF towers.
    1994: “Congress freezes the funding on HAARP until planners increase the emphasis on earth penetrating tomography uses, for nuclear counterproliferation efforts.” Once again, we have to wonder if this technology might be used to create earthquakes, as well as monitor compliance with nuclear test ban treaties.
    1995: “Congress budgets $10 million for 1996, under “nuclear counterproliferation’ efforts for HAARP project.” At least now we know that the U.S. Government is in firm control of HAARP, the same government driving us full speed into the global government of Antichrist, known as the New World Order.
    1994-6: “Testing of first stage of HAARP equipment continues …”
    1996: HAARP planners to test the earth penetrating tomography applications by modulating the electroject at ELF frequencies.” Let’s see, were there any severe or unusual earthquakes, or series of earthquakes, in 1996? We shall study this and get back to you.
    1998: “Projected date for fully operating HAARP system.” We have had the most unusual severe weather in 1997 and 1998. It is no coincidence that the onset of this unprecedented weather coincided with the completion of the HAARP system. Now, scientists can create and control all types of weather, especially disasters.
    Evergreen Aviation has a long history of government contracts, ranging from the USPS to unmanned flight operations for the USAF.

    source http://aircrap.org

      Current date/time is Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:14 pm